The cyclical nature of violence and the courage to denounce it

Human history is marked by conflicts, wars, and injustices that have left deep scars on the social and cultural fabric of entire nations. Among these, the Palestinian question represents one of the most intricate and painful issues, a symbol of suffering and resistance that continues to challenge the consciences of those who observe from afar and those who experience this reality daily. Violence, in all its forms, is never a solution.

It only breeds more violence, fueling a destructive cycle that destroys not only human lives, but also hopes, dreams, and possibilities for a better future. The destruction of infrastructure, the loss of innocent lives, and the denial of fundamental rights are manifestations of an injustice that cannot be ignored.

In this context, silence becomes complicity. Denouncing injustice is not only an act of courage, but a moral duty. It is a way to affirm one's humanity and refuse to be passive spectators of a tragedy that demands action and solidarity. The testimony of individuals like Yuval Green , who choose to oppose unjust orders and speak openly about the atrocities they have experienced, represents a ray of hope in an otherwise dark landscape.

But denouncing the situation is not enough. A collective commitment is needed to promote dialogue, mutual understanding, and the building of bridges between communities. Only through an inclusive and respectful approach can we hope to end the cycle of violence and lay the foundations for lasting peace.

The West, often celebrated as a bastion of democracy and human rights, is not without its responsibilities. Its policies and its support for certain geopolitical dynamics raise questions about the coherence of its proclaimed values. It is crucial that Western nations take an active role in promoting equitable and sustainable solutions, rather than perpetuating inequality and division.

The Palestinian question invites us to reflect on what it means to be human and what our role is in a world marked by injustice. Denouncing, acting, and promoting peace are not just choices, but responsibilities that define our journey on this earth. Only in this way can we hope to leave a legacy of hope and justice for future generations.

They told me to burn the homes of Palestinian civilians. This war is madness.

Yuval Green 's testimony highlights his personal and moral evolution in the face of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. From a young man who grew up with the idea of ​​serving in the army as an integral part of his national identity, Yuval becomes an example of conscientious objection. Through his firsthand experiences in Gaza and the West Bank, he has seen the occupation and violence with new eyes, transforming his perception of military service and the dynamics of oppression.

Moral dissonance and the red line 

Yuval Green faces profound moral dissonance when he is forced to carry out orders he considers neither just nor strategically sound. The episode in which his commander orders the burning of a civilian home becomes a turning point in his conscience. This moment reflects the conflict between military obedience and individual ethical responsibility, leading him to question the system and his role within it.

Revenge passed off as strategy 

Yuval Green clearly distinguishes between strategic motivations and what he perceives as actions driven by revenge or brutal ideologies. This raises a critique of military conduct and the justification of actions based on alleged military necessity. His denunciation is a call to reflect on how these actions actually contribute to security and peace, rather than perpetuating the cycle of violence.

Dehumanization and ideological bias 

Yuval Green 's reflections is the dehumanization of Palestinians. He observes how language and common opinions have shifted toward extreme polarization, eliminating the possibility of seeing others as equals, with the right to live. This dehumanization is not only harmful to the victims, but also undermines Israeli society and its potential for a more peaceful and just future.

Yuval Green 's testimony represents a rare and powerful voice denouncing the brutality of war and occupation. His words are a call to rediscover humanity, to recognize every individual's right to life, and to work for a future that breaks the cycle of violence. Green doesn't simply criticize: he proposes change through dialogue and moral conscience. It's a reflection that challenges not only military policies, but also civil society and its role in perpetuating or resolving conflict.

What's different about them from us? Are their dreams different from ours? And are their children different from ours? How can we convince them and us that if this "story will never end" continues? They won't forget! They will always enlist. They will always be martyrs. We will never have, nor will they ever have, peace! No one is excluded. How can we not understand all this? Look them in the eyes and think!

A*G

A surgical, lucid, cynical, and analytical plan for the extermination and genocide of the Palestinian people, which is matched by their aberrant, abominable, and ruthless vision of turning Palestine the sole land of Israel , without the presence of "those" they don't even call " Palestinians "—so as not to confuse their minds—but Arabs, who do not deserve to live in those lands, because they were given to them by God and which, according to the minds of the fanatics they are, they believe were assigned to them by divine and religious attribution, not by actual territorial ownership. And this way of thinking and acting, for the West, represents the only true democracy in the modern Middle East. What happened in Gaza is as much as what happened in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, in Dresden, in Aleppo, in Fallujah. Let us not make the mistake of thinking that this extremism is ridiculous, even folkloristic, because it is not at all. Let us never underestimate these phenomena. Because the flip side of every Star of David can represent the sad and shameful strategy and symbolism of an Pentacle . And that's aberrant!

A*G

The perception of a systematic and deliberate plan for the extermination and genocide of the Palestinian people stems from a combination of historical, political, and ideological factors that have fueled tensions and conflicts in the region. This perception is often linked to:

1. Religious and ideological narrative : Some extremist groups interpret history and religion as justification for claiming territories, claiming they were given to them by God. This approach can lead to an exclusive and dehumanizing view of those who live in those territories, fueling feelings of superiority and justifying violent actions.

2. Dehumanization of the "enemy" : The decision not to recognize Palestinians as such, but to simply define them as "Arabs," can be seen as an attempt to erase their identity and historical legitimacy. This process of dehumanization facilitates the justification of aggressive actions and the denial of fundamental rights.

3. Occupation and Settlement Policies : Israeli settlement expansion and occupation policies are often perceived as part of a strategic plan to alter demographics and territorial control, progressively reducing the space and resources available to Palestinians.

4. Political and military rhetoric : Military actions and political statements that downplay Palestinian suffering or justify violence as a strategic necessity help reinforce this perception of a cynical and calculated plan.

5. International silence : The lack of a strong and united response from the international community can be interpreted as a form of complicity or indifference, further fueling the perception of a deliberate plan.

This vision, though widely shared, is also the subject of debate and contestation. It is important to analyze the complex dynamics of the conflict with a critical and informed approach, recognizing the responsibilities of all parties involved and working toward a solution that promotes peace and mutual respect.

Daniella Weiss 's words and actions represent a negative sense) of how ideologies and narratives can shape policies and perceptions in conflict contexts . Her seemingly ordinary embodies a political vision that has had a significant impact on the reality of the West Bank and Israeli settlements .

His claim that Palestinians are a " modern invention " reflects a narrative that seeks to delegitimize the identity and rights of an entire people . This type of rhetoric not only fuels divisions , but also makes dialogue and the search for a peaceful solution even more difficult . The denial of Palestinian identity is a strategy that has historically been used to justify policies of territorial expansion and exclusion.

Her role as "godmother" of the settler movement and her influence on the Israeli government underscore how her unsound ideas are rooted in an ideological vision that views land as an exclusive right , based on a historical and religious narrative . This approach, however, ignores the complex realities and suffering of the Palestinian communities living on those lands .

His statements, such as the one on the expulsion of Arabs from the Gaza Strip , raise profound questions about how ideologies can influence policies and perpetuate conflict . It's an example of how words can carry enormous weight, helping to shape not only policies but also the perceptions and emotions of those involved.

This figure and his positions invite us to reflect on the importance of promoting narratives that foster dialogue and mutual recognition, rather than fueling division and conflict. History teaches us that peace cannot be built on foundations of exclusion and denial, but requires a commitment to mutual understanding and respect.

Daniella Weiss is a deeply controversial and influential figure in Israeli politics and the settlement movement . Her origins and family background outline a profile rooted in Judaism and a political awareness that was consolidated from a young age. Her personal and political journey reflects an extreme nationalist vision, interweaving historical and religious narratives to justify concrete actions on the ground.

His activism in the settlement movement, culminating in his leadership of the Nachala movement , demonstrates his organizational skills and ability to mobilize entire communities. His rhetoric, which denies the legitimacy of Palestinian identity and promotes an exclusive vision of the land as Jewish heritage , not only polarizes the debate but has a direct impact on the region's politics and social fabric.

The idea of ​​" making all of Gaza Jewish ," expressed in recent interviews, underscores a radical position that leaves no room for recognition of the Strip's current Palestinian population. This vision is not only a form of ideological extremism but also poses a threat to any attempt at a peaceful resolution to the conflict.

Imagine a world where millions of people are uprooted from their lands, their homes, their history. Deporting all Palestinians to other parts of the world is not only a profoundly unjust idea, but would have devastating consequences on multiple levels.

1. An unprecedented humanitarian crisis. With 1.7 million Palestinian refugees in the Gaza Strip alone and millions more in the West Bank, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria, a deportation operation would create one of the largest humanitarian crises in modern history. Millions of people would be forced to live in extremely precarious conditions, without access to essential resources such as food, water, education, and healthcare.

2. Destruction of cultural and historical identity. Palestine is not just a land, but a symbol of identity, culture, and history for the Palestinian people. Deporting them would mean erasing centuries of traditions, family ties, and historical roots. It would be an act of cultural denial that would leave an irreparable void.

3. Geopolitical Instability. Such a large-scale action would further destabilize the Middle East and have global repercussions. Countries taking in millions of refugees would find themselves under unsustainable pressure, risking internal conflict and international tensions.

4. Violation of Human Rights Forced deportation is a violation of international law and fundamental human rights. Everyone has the right to live in their own country, to maintain their identity, and to be protected from acts of discrimination and oppression.

5. Fueling hatred and resentment. Such extreme action would only fuel feelings of hatred and resentment, creating generations of people who would feel betrayed and abandoned. This would perpetuate the cycle of violence and conflict, making any prospect of peace impossible.

6. A dangerous precedent. Deporting an entire population would set a dangerous precedent, legitimizing similar actions in other parts of the world. It would be a step backward for humanity, a return to an era when force prevailed over justice and human dignity.

In conclusion, deporting Palestinians would not solve any problems, but would create new ones, more serious and more difficult to address. This idea goes against the fundamental principles of humanity, justice, and mutual respect. The path to peace lies not through exile, but through dialogue, understanding, and the recognition of everyone's rights.

We close with a quote ( from a transcript ) from former President Biden, dated October 7th, which read: " Hamas does not represent the Palestinian people's right to dignity and self-determination. Its explicit goal is the annihilation of the State of Israel and the murder of the Jewish population ." Consider what has happened instead and how much fuel has been added to the fire since then. Our words reflect a strong and unequivocal position , even if the historical and political context in which they were spoken is multi-layered in complexity.

It's an invitation to reflect not only on stated intentions, but also on the consequences of the actions taken by all parties involved. History teaches us that statements like these, while they may be motivated by legitimate concerns, risk further fueling tensions if not accompanied by a concrete commitment to dialogue and peace. Fuel to the fire often lies not only in words, but in the actions that follow. Reflecting on this is essential to understanding how to build a different future.